Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Order KEEP AND BEAR: THE MOVIE now for FREE shipping and a FREE bumper sticker!

Conservatives have been trying to explain to liberals for years that there is NO SUCH THING as an “assault weapon” when it comes to firearms.

Technically, any weapon ever used in an assault is an “assault weapon,” but the beast that liberals pretends exists when it comes to guns, is just a myth.

If you ask a liberal to explain what an “assault weapon” is you quickly learn that they know NOTHING about the guns they are attempting to ban. Some will argue that assault weapons are “fully automatic,” except that almost all fully automatic weapons are already “banned” except for special circumstances. Some will argue that it’s a gun with a BIG “magazine or clip,” which is when we realize that they don’t understand the difference between a magazine and a clip. Others will argue that it’s about how the gun “looks,” which is when you realize that you’re talking to a complete and utter fool.

Why would what a gun looks like be a deciding factor in whether or not it should be banned? What sense does that make?

It seems that one of the more popular “new” Democrats to make her way to Congress is as silly and foolish as her fellow leftists.

Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) recently tweeted this nonsense to the world:

What a ridiculous comment. The “assault weapon ban” had a negligible effect on crime and violence in America during its tenure. However, as soon as the ban was lifted, crime, violent crime, and gun crime all began to drop precipitously. Over the last decade in particular several long-term studies have been conducted showing a correlation between rising gun ownership and declining gun crime: See here, here, and here.

Thankfully, many much wiser Americans were on Twitter to inform Harris that her suggestion was idiotic.

Become an Insider!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and read our latest and greatest updates!

Send this to a friend