Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Order KEEP AND BEAR: THE MOVIE now for FREE shipping and a FREE bumper sticker!
Store

Christine Blasey Ford’s ex-boyfriend submitted a sworn statement that pretty much annihilates her case.

The man describes how Ford coached a friend on how to pass a polygraph, lied about her fears of flying, and never once mentioned Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s name during their six years together.

Ford “passed” her own polygraph before testifying, later admitting to the Senate Judiciary Committee that she never coached anyone on how to pass a polygraph.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Keep and Bear updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: WATCH: Warren Blatantly Lies About Parents Eloping Because Mom Was Indian

If true, this would prove Ford lied under oath.

The ex-boyfriend also claims Ford stole his credit card and spent lavishly, while also cheating on him.

From KCBY:

The letter was released by Fox News Wednesday morning. The man’s name was redacted, but he claims to have been in a six-year relationship with Ford from 1992 to 1998.

The letter tells of an encounter in which Dr. Ford coached a friend, Monica McLean, on taking a polygraph test. It also says that she never mentioned a sexual assault nor expressed a fear of flying. Monica McLean is one of several women who signed an open letter of support backing Dr. Ford’s claims shortly after they were made public.

In addition, the letter says she committed credit card fraud and was unfaithful in the relationship.

The woman the ex-boyfriend says was the person Ford coached to pass a polygraph is denying:

Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, the woman who asked the majority of questions for Republicans during Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, appears to have completely exonerated Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

As noted by Jacob Wohl, “Rachel Mitchell finds Ford’s allegations totally suspect, potentially fraudulent.”

Kind of a big deal.

Mitchell notes: “The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorney’s likely affected her account.”

Some of the highlights include:

1. “Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.”

2. “Dr. Ford struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.”

3. “When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.”

Continued:

4. “Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question—details that could help corroborate her account.”

5. “She does not remember in what house the alleged assault took place or where that house was located with any specificity.”

6. “Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.”

Late Wednesday night, Kavanaugh’s FBI probe was sent to the White House.

What was found?

Zilch.

From Fox News:

The White House — after reviewing interview reports from the FBI’s probe into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh — found no corroboration of the allegations of sexual misconduct leveled against the federal judge, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing sources.

It was unclear if the White House had finalized its review.

The Journal pointed out that the FBI report may do little to provide clarity and essentially leave senators in the same position as last week: two witnesses giving different accounts on what occurred.</blockquoteK

Continued:

The report comes as senior congressional sources tell Fox News that the Senate Judiciary Committee has still not received the FBI’s report on Kavanaugh. Senators will be able to view the report in a secure area off the Senate subway.

Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and committee member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., would be given the first chance to look at the report.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Become an Insider!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and read our latest and greatest updates!

Send this to a friend