Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Order KEEP AND BEAR: THE MOVIE now for FREE shipping and a FREE bumper sticker!
Store

Partisan hackery in American politics tends to polarize into absurdity when it comes to the subject of the Second Amendment.

There is just something about the right to bear arms that triggers the left in a way that nothing else can.  It’s as if guns were the all time most villainous scourge on the planet, ready to rise up and snatch the life right from our children without warning.  This explains all of the necessary reminders to the democratic population of this great nation that “guns” don’t kill people.

Now, as the Ruger firearm company faces a mounting financial battle, the ultraliberal New York Times is ready to pile on the pedantic insults – something that the paper has excelled at in recent years.

Technically, this may be the only thing that the paper has excelled at, given their own dire economic situation.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Keep and Bear updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The New York Times ran a column on February 9, 2018, suggesting Ruger Firearms would be pro-gun control if founder William B. Ruger Sr. was still alive.

“To bolster this claim they published a ‘proposal,’ circa 1989, and attributed it to Mr. Ruger via a link to a news story that said Ruger execs were, at that time, expressing a willingness to limit ammunition magazines to 15 rounds (versus 20 or 30).”

Trending: BREAKING: Kavanaugh Accuser May NOT Show Up to Thursday Hearing (Details)

This tiny bit of misinformation was then extrapolated on by the doomed leftist echo chamber.

“The NYT also failed note Ruger Jr. saying, ‘Of course we’re concerned any time one of our guns shows up on a crime report. But passing more gun laws is not going to stop such crime or criminals. As long as criminals are around, they’ll have guns.’

“The February 9 piece rests on two statements—one from Ruger Sr. and one from Ruger Jr.—both of which are attributed to Ruger Sr. and both of which are presented while ignoring the overwhelming body of anti-gun control statements made by Ruger Jr.”

Way to kick a man while they’re down…or far too deceased to defend themselves.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Become an Insider!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and read our latest and greatest updates!

Send this to a friend